JM Plasters vs Sakarni alternative
JM Plasters vs. Sakarni: A Side-by-Side Comparison
| Criteria | JM Plasters | Sakarni |
|---|---|---|
| Quality and Purity | High purity gypsum, superior whiteness, and smoothness. | Decent quality, but may contain impurities, affecting finish consistency. |
| Consistency and Workability | Consistent texture, easy application, good adhesion, and ample working time. | Inconsistent batches, potential gritty texture, and challenging application. |
| Setting Time and Durability | Balanced setting time, durable, and resistant to cracking. | Quick setting, but sometimes too rapid; potential for cracks over time. |
| Customer Support and Availability | Excellent customer support, responsive, and widely available. | Widely available but inconsistent customer support. |
| Price and Value for Money | Slightly more expensive but offers superior long-term value. | More affordable, but may incur higher long-term costs due to quality issues. |
Conclusion:
JM Plasters stands out as the better choice due to its superior quality, consistency, and durability, despite being slightly more expensive than Sakarni.
